UK offers US blueprint to pursue Jim Crow reparations

Nearly half a century later, Great Britain has finally taken the steps to admit their part in the brutality endured by Kenyans while under British colonial rule. And it’s time for the United States to do the same for its citizens.

But it seems that every time anyone broaches the subject of reparations for slavery, there’s never any kind of consensus, on either side, as more questions arise than solutions to the problem.  Whether or not such payments are justified is always the main issue.  Those against see Affirmative Action policies as a system of reparations already in place that look to correct those lingering wrongs of our past Jim Crow period.  Some of those in favor of payments seek, in no short order, to acquire their promised “forty acres and a mule”, or the equivalent commercial value of such on today’s market.  Others look for less tangible awards that could bring real, social change to our inner cities; things like public education reform, more jobs and higher wages.

Both sides bicker back and forth and agreement becomes that forgotten pot on a back burner while the families who have truly lost have no recourse for justice.  But the UK has handed the US a blueprint to follow, if she is so inclined. In 2001, the Associated Press produced a series of articles entitled, Torn from the Land, that revealed case histories of land grabbing, more times than not through the use of violence, intimidation, outright theft or appropriation and murder.

“The Associated Press documented 57 violent land takings-more than half of the 107 land takings found in an 18-month investigation of black land loss in America.  The other cases involved trickery and legal manipulations.”

The Authentic Voice – Torn from the Land; AP, December 3, 2001

If it wanted to, the United States could seek out those individuals or families whose descendants were robbed or killed for their property in the same way that Great Britaininvestigated and identified 5,228 Kenyans who were tortured at the hands of British colonial soldiers.

“If you’re looking for stolen black land, just follow the lynching trail”.

Ray Winbush – Director, Fisk University Race Relations Institute

Incidents where murder was committed and the estates of individuals stolen would be a proper place to begin the repair.  On the one hand, you have documented proof of the theft or fraud, information that should allow you to seek damages.  On the other hand, there is no statute of limitations for murder.  And even if the crime can’t be criminally adjudicated, you should still be able to seek monetary damages in civil court.  Besides, the idea of compensation for wrongs, past or present, is not lost on the government.

In 1980, the United States officially apologized for the internment of more than 100,000 Japanese Americans during World War II.  President Jimmy Carter appointed a commission to investigate the camps and whether their creation was legitimately justified.  The Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians recommended that surviving internees or their descendants receive payments of $20,000 each.

During the Iraq war, condolence payments-money distributed to Iraqi families whose victims were harmed or killed by US military action-rose from $5 million in 2004 to over $20 million in 2005, according to Pentagon financial data. ( News)  The United States was also paying the families of Afghan war victims $2,000 for each death and $1,000 for each person wounded.  This amount increased to $50,000 for each villager killed in the rogue attack by Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales on March 11, 2012. In that case, each villager wounded received $11,000.

So, why is it a problem when it comes to reparations, specific reparations for instances of land grabbing and murder that occurred right here in the United States?  It’s not as if to do so is unprecedented.  And of course, it’s understandable that the federal government would be reluctant in revisiting crimes perpetrated by white Americans during a rather ugly time in our history when the country was finding itself and grappling with the seeds of white supremacy.  It would be painful for all citizens to have to relive that period but doing so would allow us, like the UK, to finally begin to come full circle and start the serious healing.

If you didn’t know better, you’d think that America was alright with paying everybody, and anybody, but its own African-American citizens.  I’m just saying…

Associated Press – Torn from the Land


Filed under Opinion

4 responses to “UK offers US blueprint to pursue Jim Crow reparations

  1. AJW

    America is reluctant to take complete responsibility because doing such would mean that our country’s founding fathers were less honorable than as our history text books portray them. Can America admit that enslaved Africans played a significant role in making this country what it is today? Can America admit that blacks are a legitimate part of this country’s founding and be able to explain why blacks were treated as sub-human or inferior for centuries? Taking responsibility for the injustices done to black Americans during and post-enslavement would mean admitting that the white men who were given credit for the success of this nation were likely only as good as the black men he had slaving for him. It would mean that America would have to admit that it became a great nation by cheating – cheating African men by forcing them to build a nation but taking the credit; cheating by making African men, women and children work the land without paying them; cheating by raping and impregnating African women and counting the mixed-race offspring as black just to increase his slave property; cheating all of America into thinking that white man is an honorable and flawless. With reparations come too many admissions and confessions that white America is not ready to make.

    • Thanks for your comment, Arlean. Not only African-Americans but, truthfully, immigrants in general were cheated, abused, and often killed for the sake of the jobs they were doing; Asians, Africans, Native Americans, Irish, Italians. I shudder to think of the number of unmarked graves that exist across this country, especially along the trail of industrialization, as progress made its way west.

  2. Dana

    I think the issue of land grabbing is one that should be addressed and pursued.I was aware of many of the crimes perpetrated against African-Americans of this painful and dangerous era but this is new information.
    Thanks.Will look into this further.

    • Thanks for the comment, Dana. It’s true; land grabbibng is a little known fact about our dark history. When we hear aboput lynchings we’re never told of the many varied reasons behind it. That folkls could be killed for their property with no recourse to justice is totally unacceptable for a country that thinks they are the leader of the free world. It’s time that we practice what we preach. Thanks again for your input and come back often!! Take care and be careful out there!

Don't be Shy, Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s